Unified Approach to Convex Robust Distributed Control given Arbitrary Information Structures

We consider the problem of computing optimal linear control policies for linear systems in finite-horizon. The states and the inputs are required to remain inside pre-specified safety sets at all times despite unknown disturbances. In this technical note, we focus on the requirement that the control policy is distributed, in the sense that it can only be based on partial information about the history of the outputs. It is well-known that when a condition denoted as Quadratic Invariance (QI) holds, the optimal distributed control policy can be computed in a tractable way. Our goal is to unify and generalize the class of information structures over which quadratic invariance is equivalent to a test over finitely many binary matrices. The test we propose certifies convexity of the output-feedback distributed control problem in finite-horizon given any arbitrarily defined information structure, including the case of time varying communication networks and forgetting mechanisms. Furthermore, the framework we consider allows for including polytopic constraints on the states and the inputs in a natural way, without affecting convexity

Geometric versus Model Predictive Control based guidance algorithms for fixed-wing UAVs in the presence of very strong wind fields.

The recent years have witnessed increased development of small, autonomous fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In order to unlock widespread applicability of these platforms, they need to be capable of operating under a variety of environmental conditions. Due to their small size, low weight, and low speeds, they require the capability of coping with wind speeds that are approaching or even faster than the nominal airspeed. In this thesis, a nonlinear-geometric guidance strategy is presented, addressing this problem. More broadly, a methodology is proposed for the high-level control of non-holonomic unicycle-like vehicles in the presence of strong flowfields (e.g. winds, underwater currents) which may outreach the maximum vehicle speed. The proposed strategy guarantees convergence to a safe and stable vehicle configuration with respect to the flowfield, while preserving some tracking performance with respect to the target path. As an alternative approach, an algorithm based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) is developed, and a comparison between advantages and disadvantages of both approaches is drawn. Evaluations in simulations and a challenging real-world flight experiment in very windy conditions confirm the feasibility of the proposed guidance approach

Geometric versus Model Predictive Control based guidance algorithms for fixed-wing UAVs in the presence of very strong wind fields.

The recent years have witnessed increased development of small, autonomous fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In order to unlock widespread applicability of these platforms, they need to be capable of operating under a variety of environmental conditions. Due to their small size, low weight, and low speeds, they require the capability of coping with wind speeds that are approaching or even faster than the nominal airspeed. In this thesis, a nonlinear-geometric guidance strategy is presented, addressing this problem. More broadly, a methodology is proposed for the high-level control of non-holonomic unicycle-like vehicles in the presence of strong flowfields (e.g. winds, underwater currents) which may outreach the maximum vehicle speed. The proposed strategy guarantees convergence to a safe and stable vehicle configuration with respect to the flowfield, while preserving some tracking performance with respect to the target path. As an alternative approach, an algorithm based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) is developed, and a comparison between advantages and disadvantages of both approaches is drawn. Evaluations in simulations and a challenging real-world flight experiment in very windy conditions confirm the feasibility of the proposed guidance approach

System-level, Input-output and New Parameterizations of Stabilizing Controllers, and Their Numerical Computation

It is known that the set of internally stabilizing controller $\mathcal{C}_{\text{stab}}$ is non-convex, but it admits convex characterizations using certain closed-loop maps: a classical result is the {Youla parameterization}, and two recent notions are the {system-level parameterization} (SLP) and the {input-output parameterization} (IOP). In this paper, we address the existence of new convex parameterizations and discuss potential tradeoffs of each parametrization in different scenarios. Our main contributions are: 1) We first reveal that only four groups of stable closed-loop transfer matrices are equivalent to internal stability: one of them is used in the SLP, another one is used in the IOP, and the other two are new, leading to two new convex parameterizations of $\mathcal{C}_{\text{stab}}$. 2) We then investigate the properties of these parameterizations after imposing the finite impulse response (FIR) approximation, revealing that the IOP has the best ability of approximating $\mathcal{C}_{\text{stab}}$ given FIR constraints. 3) These four parameterizations require no \emph{a priori} doubly-coprime factorization of the plant, but impose a set of equality constraints. However, these equality constraints will never be satisfied exactly in numerical computation. We prove that the IOP is numerically robust for open-loop stable plants, in the sense that small mismatches in the equality constraints do not compromise the closed-loop stability. The SLP is known to enjoy numerical robustness in the state feedback case; here, we show that numerical robustness of the four-block SLP controller requires case-by-case analysis in the general output feedback case.Comment: 20 pages; 5 figures. Added extensions on numerial computation and robustness of closed-loop parameterization

On the Equivalence of Youla, System-level and Input-output Parameterizations

A convex parameterization of internally stabilizing controllers is fundamental for many controller synthesis procedures. The celebrated Youla parameterization relies on a doubly-coprime factorization of the system, while the recent system-level and input-output characterizations require no doubly-coprime factorization but a set of equality constraints for achievable closed-loop responses. In this paper, we present explicit affine mappings among Youla, system-level and input-output parameterizations. Two direct implications of the affine mappings are 1) any convex problem in Youla, system level, or input-output parameters can be equivalently and convexly formulated in any other one of these frameworks, including the convex system-level synthesis (SLS); 2) the condition of quadratic invariance (QI) is sufficient and necessary for the classical distributed control problem to admit an equivalent convex reformulation in terms of Youla, system-level, or input-output parameters.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure

Sparsity Invariance for Convex Design of Distributed Controllers

We address the problem of designing optimal linear time-invariant (LTI) sparse controllers for LTI systems, which corresponds to minimizing a norm of the closed-loop system subject to sparsity constraints on the controller structure. This problem is NP-hard in general and motivates the development of tractable approximations. We characterize a class of convex restrictions based on a new notion of Sparsity Invariance (SI). The underlying idea of SI is to design sparsity patterns for transfer matrices Y(s) and X(s) such that any corresponding controller K(s)=Y(s)X(s)^-1 exhibits the desired sparsity pattern. For sparsity constraints, the approach of SI goes beyond the notion of Quadratic Invariance (QI): 1) the SI approach always yields a convex restriction; 2) the solution via the SI approach is guaranteed to be globally optimal when QI holds and performs at least as well as considering a nearest QI subset. Moreover, the notion of SI naturally applies to designing structured static controllers, while QI is not utilizable. Numerical examples show that even for non-QI cases, SI can recover solutions that are 1) globally optimal and 2) strictly more performing than previous methods

Teoria del consenso e applicazione al problema del coordinamento del moto di robot.

Il sempre crescente numero di applicazioni di reti di sensori, robot cooperanti e formazioni di veicoli, ha fatto sì che le problematiche legate al coordinamento di sistemi multi-agente (MAS) diventassero tra le più studiate nell’ambito della teoria dei controlli. Esistono numerosi approcci per affrontare il problema, spesso profondamente diversi tra loro. La strategia studiata in questa tesi è basata sulla Teoria del Consenso, che ha una natura distribuita e completamente leader-less; inoltre il contenuto informativo scambiato tra gli agenti è ridotto al minimo. I primi 3 capitoli introducono ed analizzano le leggi di interazione (Protocolli di Consenso) che permettono di coordinare un Network di sistemi dinamici. Nel capitolo 4 si pensa all'applicazione della teoria al problema del "loitering" circolare di più robot volanti attorno ad un obiettivo in movimento. Si sviluppa a tale scopo una simulazione in ambiente Matlab/Simulink, che genera le traiettorie di riferimento di raggio e centro impostabili, a partire da qualunque posizione iniziale degli agenti. Tale simulazione è stata utilizzata presso il “Center for Research on Complex Automated Systems” (CASY-DEI Università di Bologna) per implementare il loitering di una rete di quadrirotori "CrazyFlie". I risultati ed il setup di laboratorio sono riportati nel capitolo 5. Sviluppi futuri si concentreranno su algoritmi locali che permettano agli agenti di evitare collisioni durante i transitori: il controllo di collision-avoidance dovrà essere completamente indipendente da quello di consenso, per non snaturare il protocollo di Consenso stesso